Wednesday, July 18, 2012

ha ha!


********************************************
the next day:


Sunday, July 15, 2012

a lot of great clouds in the sky today









a short rant about Spotify's iPhone app

If you're thinking of going premium with Spotify for the iPhone app don't bother. It's a piece of crap that crashes every 20-30 minutes. That said, the service is worth the money even without it. Still it bothers me because if you tell me I'm going to get something for my money I want EVERYTHING you offered. I feel like I'm being taken advantage of by the developers who have been aware of the problem for a long, long time and have not addressed it. It CAN'T be a major bug so what's the deal? You know? Boo hoo! Punks! Thieves. Disappointing. But hey, for 10 bucks you can turn your laptop into one of the biggest, most diverse record collection you could dream of. Perhaps it's too much to expect to be able to do the same with an iPhone. No? Then why did you wastrels tell me it was part of the deal? This is the kind of stuff that turns your ordinary upstanding citizen into a Unabomber. Like when the Man keeps you down, you know? Makes you think they've got you sunk, pushed down to some bottom level of their insidious Monarch Mind Control techniques. It makes you give up all hope for the technology that brought us the Internet as well as the social corruption & degradation it brought along for the ride. I feel I've been exiled and excommunicated by the high priests at Spotify who pontificate and praise the many wonders of their product while turning a blind eye to it's defects and shortcomings. They sit around plotting and scheming all day long to find a way to get the licensing for Beatles songs, Pink Floyd songs, Led Zeppelin songs...I say WAKE UP!!! Beatles fans can listen to their CDs and MP3s cuz you KNOW they've already bought 'em. Floyd and Zep fans, too. Hell, they can just turn on the classic rock radio station and wait a few minutes, they'll hear something by them. I say STOP MESSING AROUND WITH THAT, SPOTIFY!!! Get your spit together. FIX yer apps. Start firing your developers, take a trip down to Silicon Valley and find some new ones, for God's sake. Ones that can take charge of the situation. Ones that can, in the words of a great postmodern thinker, GIT 'ER DONE. I'm dead serious about this. I've been let down too long. I see people cancelling their subscriptions left and right because of this. Yes, you goofballs, I've thought about it, too. Lucky for you you've got a few things going for that none of the other streaming subscription music services I've seen have. Bigger file size/better sound quality is the hook you've got me reeled in on. Trust me, that's the ONLY thing, because as far as selection and UI are concerned Rhapsody and Rdio both are comparable and in some ways even better. But they've got crappy sound quality. Really crappy. That might not be an issue with some people and as such I don't have any qualms about recommending either service over Spotify to those people. I hate to do that, too, because I'd rather be true blue to the core. I'd rather be faithful and loyal to a company that I believe in. I don't pay for Internet services as a rule. But I've made the exception with Spotify and that's got to mean something, right? All they need do is fix the crashes and I'll gladly give them enough free PR to afford the licenses for those Beatles songs I mentioned earlier. Punks! Get with the program! NOW! FIXXXXXXXX!!!!


Update: Ummm, well. I guess I should apologize. A helpful member (Moderator) of the Spotify Community gave me the solution to my problem, which was simple as changing a streaming setting from "Normal" to "High". How was I to know? I always figured "normal" meant "normal". Doesn't matter, though, because all is working properly. It wouldn't be a bad idea for the developers to put a troubleshooting page in the app. 

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Sigur Ros: "Valtari"



I remember when Sigur Ros' last studio album came out. I debated long and hard whether I should listen to the full-length stream of "Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust" or wait another week until the official release. Eventually my curiosity got the better of me and I spent considerable time with the low-quality stream. I recall being hesitant at first because the record was so much different from it's successor, "Takk".

"Takk" is, in my humble opinion, probably the best record ever made. Sounds like lunatic hyperbole, doesn't it? I don't expect anyone to jump on the bandwagon...Even now I can hear the choruses of "are you crazy?" So be it. There's a spirit about their 4th album that moves me every single time I hear it (and trust me I've listened to it countless times). There's not a single moment on the entire album that fails to impress. It flows seamlessly from song to song, an hour passes and you wonder where it went off to. Even so, the songs stand on their own every bit as successfully. It's easy to get lost in "Takk". It's epic. There's not an album like it. There will never be another album like it.

So why did so many people expect "Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust" to be anything like "Takk" or any of their other records, for that matter? Why were so many disappointed? To my credit it didn't take long for me to integrate this observation into my expectations of the music. Okay, so getting used to the first single, "Gobbledigook", was a whole 'nother story, but I won't go into that, other than to say that I still sort of have to mentally disengage that song from the rest of the album before I can appreciate it totally.

I confess I didn't quite "get" "Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust" on the first few tries either. A couple of songs really stood out for me initially. "Gódan daginn" and the title track, for instance, sounded like exactly what I believed Sigur Ros should sound like. "Ára bátur" showed a lot of promise, but I figured it would take some time to find the right state of mind to appreciate it fully. "All Alright" is such a fragile song that it's hard to listen to even after all this time, though I've toughened up my Inner Child since then to the point where I can actually hear without feeling too unfomfortable. "Inní mér syngur vitleysingur" and "Vid spilum endalaust" were so far out of the expected mold that I thought for sure I wouldn't cotton to them. But guess what? They are a couple of my favorite Sigur Ros tracks now! I don't know how many other people who bought the record and felt let down eventually came around, but I can honestly say that "Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust" is right up there with "Takk" on my list of best Sigur Ros albums.

It's been three years since all that...three years with Sigur Ros on "hiatus" while Jonsi donned a bird outfit, wrote a slew of really good pop songs and toured the world with a show that was a real life-changing experience...though I wouldn't know that personally, since I was unable to arrange a trip to Laurence, Kansas. My life remains, at least in that aspect, unchanged. Jonsi was relatively "everywhere" last year, from a television ad (???????), a slew of talk shows, even composing the complete score for "We Bought a Zoo". Seeing as how 99% of all Sigur Ros fans love Jonsi and are on board with practically everything he does, one could be forgiven for suspecting a distinct possibility that the next Sigur Ros album ("please, Lord, let there BE a 'next' Sigur Ros album") might just contain some pop elements. After all, there were indeed a few songs he was playing that could well have been proper Sigur Ros numbers ("Tornado" & "Grow Till Tall", for instance).

Three years gone. Prayers are answered. And no, there will be no "Takk" sequel. Not even a ""Með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust" " sequel. No "( )" sequel and no "Ágætis byrjun" sequel. Nothing that bears any resemblance whatsoever to Jonsi's "Go" stuff. Instead...

"Valtari". Not since "Von" has there been a Sigur Ros album so challenging, so demanding of your complete and total attention. If I may speak only for myself, it's a DIFFICULT album. Perhaps some of the difficulty is the afore-mentioned process of trying to seperate "Sigur Ros A" from "Sigur Ros B". But it's hard because you really do have to LISTEN to get the desired effected. You can't hit the "play" button, settle back and read a good book. Not to say that a couple of the songs in the second half don't make beautiful ambient music. They certainly do. But unless you're concentrating on the sounds as they come out of the air, following without trying to comprehend them, you won't get pulled quite as deep into the experience.

I've read a few reviews of the record and for the most part I don't think they've given it the credit it deserves.  That's not to say that the opinions haven't been favorable. I guess 3 1/2 out of 5 stars in Rolling Stone is nothing to scoff at, seeing as how a lot of REALLY good albums pull "only" 3. Spin gives "Valtari" 7 out of 10, which seems more realistic but their website doesn't show the actual review so I don't know what their writer is judging. Pitchfork has even less love, with only a 6.1. Even so, such rankings are nothing to be ashamed of. Still I don't think the disc has been received in the way it should have been.

And this is why...

I saw a reviewer on YouTube give his take on the album. Somewhere lost in the typical "record review jargon" the reviewer was spurting he said, and to paraphrase only slightly, "'Valtari' isn't my favorite album in Sigur Ros' catalog"... I thought, "Dude! The record just came out two weeks ago!" The guy struck me as being a fan and since he spoke in terms of "favorites" I assumed that he had the band's other discs ranked in some semblance of preference. Who knows, maybe his initial instincts will serve him faithfully and it won't become an album that, in his opinion, won't hold it's own with their earlier work.

But, and I've probably said it here already, "Valtari" is not the kind of record you're going to "get" in just a few listens. Though it may not be apparent to many who primarily listen to "popular music", "Valtari" holds a lot in common with modern symphonic music. I can't describe exactly what I mean by that, only to say that the more you listen, the DEEPER you listen, the more you appreciate (ugh! I KNOW I've already said that more than once!!!). Take a symphony by Gustav Mahler. The second one, for instance, aka "Resurrection". It's length is staggering. It violently pulls you into it's world with one of it's primary motifs. Then you practically drown in all the different melodies, textures, etc. until by the end of the piece you're not really sure exactly what you've been through. But you know that there's something, some "things" you've missed. Pieces of a puzzle which, when put together, will make the the artistic vision a bit clearer and the listening experience more fulfilling. With Mahler (and practically all classical music in general) there are a LOT of puzzle pieces. And it's not so much that the pieces "complete" the symphony. You'll eventually learn that the symphony can NEVER be complete. Because it's dependent upon the listener to determine HOW the puzzle pieces fit together. It's an interactive process in which the brain is given free reign to assemble and dissemble sounds and melodies at it's pleasure, at it's whim even. It cannot be complete, but the more you listen the more you are familiar with the possibilities, having noticed or used them before in some combination or another.

This is how I listen to "Valtari". It's no less challenging, in it's way, than Mahler's second. Ian Cohen, in Pitchfork's review, speaks of the album as "leaving you to fashion highlights out of relativity". Maybe I'm just looking for something different in the music I generally listen to but WOW that sounds like it would be AWESOME!!! Isn't that what postmodernism is all about? He describes the music as "work, a trudge, asking for too much by way of demanding nothing concrete." This demand, he feels, is "due to Sigur Ros' unwillingness to exert any sort of artistic will on the listener".

Mr. Cohen, I can understand how you might feel that way, though the assertion that the band is artistically lazy gets under my skin. And I won't insist that "Valtari" is a "maximalist version of  "( )'", even though you think we hardcore Sigur Ros fans might use it as an excuse. I'm surprised you compare it to "( )" after all. Not that you're the only one, but I suppose it's difficult/impossible to find a point of comparison for something like "Valtari" in the entire SR catalog.

There IS NO point of comparison. Listening to "Valtari" IS work, though I would add that it's only a "trudge" for those who think they've already got a firm grip on what this band is all about. Which is not meant to suggest that they haven't crafted a recognizable style and sound in the past. I only mean that if you think you're going to pigeonhole them and put them in a box, you'll be confused when they fly out and you probably won't recognize them anymore. That's the point when you'll have to decide if it's the band you're running with or just the songs. Not to say that it's a bad thing to be "all about the songs". But that's something that hardcore fans of Sigur Ros, and most other bands as well, have gone beyond.

It's at that point when people will say to you, "Oh, well, you'll just like anything that band does, whether it's good or not". On one point that is a correct assessment. Yes, I admit I will like anything Sigur Ros does. They'll put out an album that sounds like death metal cum  Partridge Family and I will listen so hard and so deep and with such respect for what they are capable of that, yes, I'll likely find a lot that appeals to me, even in a record like that!  

Okay, so...the reason I'm writing all this is because a friend of mine asked me to. Well, that's  not quite true...he asked me what I thought of the album. There's no false humility in claiming that my opinion was especially important to him. I was the one who introduced Sigur Ros to him. He happened to be one of the lucky ones who walked into the store while I was playing "Aegetis Byrjun" on the stereo. He fell in love with the band there and then and has since seen them several times (a fact which has never failed to rankle me, as I've only seen them twice). Since then he's asked for my take on every new Sigur Ros album that's come around the bend. He said he was slightly underwhelmed with "Valtari". Or at least his first impressions weren't as favorable as they had been with previous records.

Of the "Sigur-Ros-Can-Do-No-Wrong" fan type, I had the primal urge to defend it...even though I was somewhat underwhelmed myself. That's where all this "give it a few listens before you judge" comes from, I'm sure.  I've said it, I've repeated it, I've implied it...the plea "don't give up on it so quickly" is all I can offer, but I think it's valid. I believe this album will reveal itself slowly, as the band members themselves have said.

Having been almost a month now since hearing the LP in it's entirety, the question is "Well? How did it hold up for you? Was it worth the time and effort to sit through the whole thing as many times as you have?"

Yes, it has. Although I don't think I've even broken the surface of what it has to offer I have nevertheless found myself in a place where I'm comfortable and, how should I say it? Prepared for where it will lead through the days to come. At first it sounded almost unfinished. Now I can appreciate a sense of sparseness for the sounds to float within, seldom anchored by gravity. There are still a couple of things about the record that disappoint. The mixing/production quality on "Varúð" is, to my ears, atrocious. It is possible that Alex Somers & the band did this on purpose, but this detracts significantly from the song, IMO. There are other places that the production could be, once again IMO, improved. Nothing that would completely ruin the overall experience, though. Also it just doesn't feel right to me for the last three songs to be completely devoid of  a "proper" vocal part. "Proper" as opposed to the voice being used as an effect, which is all very nice, but one primary reason I love Sigur Ros is Jonsi's voice so I was kind of hoping it would put in at least one more appearance before the album's finish.

As for the individual songs... "Valtari" rises out of the mist with a song that translates as "I Breathe". "Ég anda" sounds like a house filled with ghosts. Disembodied voices floating in a large, dark room. I don't usually think of music in terms of "thought pictures" (for lack of a better term), but I can't help but envision these wraiths trapped in time and space, for some reason tethered to the world, unable to slink into eternity where they belong. The lead vocal comes in and I imagine it's an incantation chanted over the spirits, a spell to melt the cord and usher them from a prison they've almost grown used to. "Ég anda" is one of three songs that I immediately enjoyed, that only took a couple of listens before they hit.

"Ekki Múkk" is one of the three, though it had a head start, being the first song to leak from the album. As with it's predecessor, "Ekki Múkk" rises up from silence with an eerie feel. There is a similarity, for me at least, to the material on Jonsi and Alex's "Riceboy Sleeps" album, which is perfectly fine with me, since that one has grown on me to a marvelous degree since it's release. The "ace in the hole" for this song are the chilling string arrangements from Amina. Jonsi shows off his ability to hold a musical note until cows come home. Such an awesome song, I don't know that I'll cotton to any of the others as I have this one.

There's really not much to the next track, "Varúð", other than a nice three note chorus from what sounds like a boys choir. It builds and builds and builds but inevitably reaches an anti-climax. I keep expecting Orri to kick into a heavy duty full drum assault but all I get is the pounding of what sounds like a tribal war drum. Nothing wrong with war drums and the such...I hear them more as "build up" and not "climax" (haha). Its not the main reason I'm ultimately dissatisfied with the song, which is the production. Since I've already commented on it I will move on..

Next up is the other song that I immediately loved. A truly beautiful piece of music, "Rembihnútur" spends it's initial half gathering up the sounds and snatches of melody that will eventually dominate the song. Jonsi sings a soft lullaby and then it all erupts into one of the most beautiful melodies I've ever heard from him. The harmonies and multi-tracking only sweeten the sound. Maybe it is those harmonies that remind me, for some inconceivable reason, of the Beach Boys, with their tight vocal interaction. I felt the same way about "Hoppípolla" when I first heard it. Once again, I have no idea why I make the mental connection, as I am not not a fan of the Beach Boys. I do, however, acknowledge the awesome quality of their combined voices.

I don't have the vinyl version of "Valtari" (as I have not owned a turntable in decades), but it's easy for me to hear the dividing line of side A and side B on the CD. As such I have had a difficult time getting past "side A". That's not to say that the last four songs are inferior to the first in any way. Still, I feel kind of drained by the time I get to "Dauðalogn", which is not a good thing seeing as how powerful the song is. It doesn't help either that I can't shake a melodic resemblance to "All Alright" that makes me suspect lazy recycling. I know Sigur Ros has far too much integrity to have ever done something like that so I have done my best to separate the lines and have paid more attention to the expressive qualities of the vocal. Using this approach it's easy for me to hear "Dauðalogn" as one of their best songs, able to hold it's own with just about anything they've done.

Before the album came out the band licensed the CW Network show "Vampire Diaries" a portion of "Dauðalogn". It was used in a scene where a two people are seen in a car underwater, having obviously just crashed into it. There are long shots of a woman, bubbles slowly exiting mouth and nose, sitting resigned to her fate with a look in her eye that is chilling. And there in the background is Jonsi singing, Icelandic or glossolia God only knows, and it just goes so well with the images I can't help but be impressed. I watched that and I kept repeating to myself, "DON'T think of this every time you hear the song!" I hate to have a video producer's vision provide the soundtrack to any song I listen to. But it's been hard to keep from it. The fact that it's a CW show makes it even worse. But what's done is done. I've found a way to mentally evict the offensive elements while still keeping the elegiac sense that was so awesome in the juxtaposition of song and drama.

"Varðeldur", one of the last three tracks, all basically instrumental, sounds to me like little more than a lengthy epilogue of it's predecessor. It took a few spins of the entire CD before I realized that's not what it actually is. On it's own merits the song is just this side of ambient, something you'd find on a Brian Eno album. The same holds true of "Valtari", the album's namesake which translates into "Steam Roller". Not exactly "steam roller" as you'd expect with a metal album, still there does seem to be a slow, lumbering motion that gives the unlikely title credibility.

Bringing it all back home is an experimental number called "Fjögur píanó". "Four Pianos". The idea of the song was for each individual musician to play an uncomplicated piano part to a simple loop. None of them would be in the same room at the same time and none would hear the parts that were played by each other. When the four completed this process they mixed the parts together and the result is "Fjögur píanó". Knowing that gives a much deeper appreciation to what they've attempted with the experiment. I could go into my whole spiritual mumbo jumbo about the source of inspiration and how it might work itself out in a situation like this but I'll spare you. Suffice to say it's a very enjoyable number and a successful outcome for the test. The pianos fade into a last spill of ambiance that eases the listener out of "Valtari" back into the mists from which it came.

And there it goes. Like the snake eating it's own tail, drawing you, beckoning you to play it again. To travel full circle again, finding bits and pieces of sonic bliss you missed the last time around. Worth the trip. Yes, I say it's well worth the round trip.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Liverpool Legends...June 26,2012...Branson Missouri

The wife's been itching for a vacation and I figured it would do me good as well to get out of the house for a few days. We decided to go to Branson, Missouri, which is basically a tourist trap for people in the heartland who won't commit to Vegas or the coasts. Not that I'm putting it down. There are a lot of cool places to see and things to do. The main draw of Branson is live shows. Mainly country and western tributes, "jubilees" and "jamborees". Mickey Gilley has a theater there. Jim Stafford as well. The Oak Ridge Boys is probably the most recognizable act to own their own theater in Branson. LOTS of tributes, impersonators, and artists who have passed their "heyday". Ticket vendors are everywhere. 

I'd only been in Branson once before today. We stopped here for a while on the way home from a Sigur Ros concert in Kansas City. We didn't have time to do much of anything that day. There's a place called the Ripley's Believe It Or Not Museum that we checked out. A lot of fun. They've got a hologram of Walt Disney or somebody that I thought was fascinating. I'm obsessed with holograms. 

The one attraction I saw at the time that really interested me was a big theater completely decked out in Beatles regalia and the words "Liverpool Legends" in big letters on a banner that hung over the entrance. It looked like a really big deal, obviously a Beatles tribute band. I didn't know if show was a long-running affair or for a limited time but I decided that if I ever came back to Branson I would go see Liverpool Legends.

So this opportunity came up to spend three nights in a really nice hotel in Branson that came with an entertainment package where we could pick two shows from a hefty list of the theaters and attractions on the strip. Even if I hadn't already decided on Liverpool Legends much earlier I would have picked it because it was the only show that looked even halfway worth seeing (speaking for myself...I don't know what the wife might have wanted to see...she already surmised we'd go to the Beatles thing). I'm not sure exactly how much we paid for the tickets since they were built in to the package but looking up their website I found that they typically went for around $30 apiece. Okay, that wasn't so bad if the production was at the level I hoped it would be.

I saw some video clips of the group and indeed they had a good sound. It was obvious that they'd spent a LOT of time getting the music down as perfectly as possible and to be sure they did bear striking resemblances to the original Fab Four...of course some of that visual magic was probably the work of stage make-up, lighting and precise placement of the group members. 

They already had enough going for them, sight unseen, to pique my curiosity. I was already looking forward to the concert even when I read that Liverpool Legends is the only Beatles tribute band personally endorsed by George Harrison's sister. I guess that matters to some people. A seal of approval. It didn't mean all that much to me because I've seen two other Beatles tribute bands who were as good as any other could be...you can say that without having heard other bands for points of reference because the template is already established. 

But enough build-up. Here we are in Branson and the concert was last night, I'm ready to reveal what I thought about the show...

We arrived at the Icon Theater, where the production was slated to happen. If it was the same building they played 4 years ago it no longer displayed the overwhelming Beatles imagery. There was a Volkswagen Beetle outside the front door painted in bright yellow with the band's name and the words "Yellow Submarine" and periscopes sticking out of the roof just like the cartoon submarine in the film of the same name. 

The box office serves as a concession stand where people can wait for the show to begin. It is mandatory that the audience be in the building 30 minutes before the show. I couldn't figure out why that would be necessary, other than the possibility that it meant a lot of people getting tired of waiting and buying stuff the eat and drink. That's what I did. I ordered a coke. They only offer one size and it's $2.50. I couldn't tell you exactly how big it was but I'll guess 20 ounces. Did you get that? TWENTY OUNCES for TWO DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS!!! I don't think I've ever paid that much for a soda, ounce for ounce. They served bottled beer as well. I wouldn't venture a guess as to how much they were charging for those.

About 10 minutes before the show a line had formed in front of the stairway that led into the actual theater. Then about 5 minutes the door was opened and we all went in. 

The first thing that struck me was the seating. Rows of restaurant chairs. Uncomfortable and tacky. The theater looks high class from the outside so I was taken aback that there weren't rows of cushioned seats. We were told it was "open seating". I suppose it would have to be seeing as how it's pretty hard to enforce seating arrangements of RESTAURANT CHAIRS. We sat toward the back, as I can't stand anything too loud and I thought it wouldn't be so bad if we were far enough away from the stage. Besides, the farther back you sit the more like the Beatles the band looks. 

I should have known better by the size of the room. I've played in clubs that were bigger than this room. Some halfway decent lights were at the front of and behind the stage. The backdrop was a black curtain with little white "star" bulbs covering it. I decided that, despite my expectations realistic or otherwise, there would not be a multi-media presentation. Maybe I was spoiled by the production of "Rain" we say in Tulsa a couple of years ago, with it's excellent backdrops, stage settings and period costumes. Liverpool Legends was a far cry from that. They basically wore two outfits, one for each set. The first was, predictably, the collarless suit and tie. For the second they wore stuff from the "Help" period. Its what they wore during the performance of "The Night Before" in that movie. I thought for sure that would at least have Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band uniforms. Nope.

Even though we'd taken our seats in the back of the first set of seats, to hopefully get a break from the loudness, we were still blown away by ridiculous volume levels coming from the mains at the stage as well as speakers mounted above us (which we did not see, else we would have retreated even farther back into the second row of...uh...you got it...restaurant chairs. The combination of room size and volume was almost unbearable. We DID get up and go to the back during intermission. I spent a lot of time during that first set wondering if staying at the show was worth the hearing loss that would only exacerbate the tinnitus I already suffer from. I kept thinking about Mahler's 9th Symphony and how the ringing in the ear would make me depressed during the softer passages. That sounds crazy, I know. But it's true. There was absolutely NO reason why this show was this loud. None. 

Okay...did the Liverpool Legends resemble the Beatles? Well, the distance from the stage would make all the difference in the world. Unfortunately, as I mentioned earlier, there wasn't enough space in the room for anyone to be far enough away from the stage to get the full effect. The "John Guy" probably looked the most like the person he was portraying. The "Paul Guy" bore a slight resemblance, though he had a lot of stage make-up on his face. He played his bass left-handed so that was a plus (even the "Paul Guy" from "Rain" was a right hand man). The "George Guy", to my eyes, looked more like Peter Noone of Herman's Hermits than George Harrison. Then there was the "Ringo Guy" who was kind of hard to see, being hidden behind the drums. He had the nose (prosthetic or real). He played with that unmistakable "Ringo Slouch" but lost points for being right-handed. 

I know, it sounds like I'm really tearing them up here, but not really. All the issues I had with the program where with things that had nothing to do with the Liverpool Legends ability to mimic the Beatles, their singing and playing and performance style. A better production would have been much appreciated but all that, to me at least, takes a back seat to the group's talent. 

And they were talented. I would have been able to appreciate that even more at a decent volume but I have to hand it to them, they succeed as a Beatles tribute band insomuch as they actually sound like the Beatles. The harmonies were really tight. The "Paul Guy" was the only one who struggled a little to sound like his character. I say that but actually he did sound a lot more like Paul McCartney than most people could. Musically they were very well rehearsed. It sounds trite but it's true, you could close your eyes, listen to the music and actually feel like you were hearing the real thing. The "George Guy" was especially impressive with his solos...he knocked the one from "Something" out of the park.

Song selection was okay. Could have been a lot better. No "I Want to Hold Your Hand" or "She Loves You", one of which I would think were mandatory for acts like this. Of all the great songs to choose from the White Album they chose the ridiculous "Ob-La-Di Ob-La-Da". Well I suppose "Birthday" is on that one, too, and they did it justice. "No Reply" was good. A very nice take on "In My Life". I wish I could remember the song, but at one point "Paul Guy" actually forgot the first line...that was kind of hard for me to believe, all things considered. He recovered well, some people probably didn't even notice. 

When they began playing "The End" I told my wife it would be the last song and we should leave immediately following...not because of the music or the show...it was the floor. For some reason it shook pretty hard a few times during that last several minutes. The audience in front of us were up and dancing pretty hard, but not hard enough to make the ground feel like an earthquake was happening. That's exactly what it felt like. Sort of rattled me and I wasn't bothered at all that the band kicked into an encore as we walked downstairs.

A strange thing, immediately following the show they had a booth set up where you could meet and greet the four members of the band and buy souvenirs and autographed memorabilia from them. I think they would even let you take pictures with them. Above and beyond the call of duty, I say. I had no desire to partake in that portion of the proceedings. I had no idea coming in that such a thing was scheduled. Why would I want a picture of myself posing with a guy who "kinda looks like a Beatle"? Or "kinda looks like Peter Noone" as the case may be. 

To sum it all up, yes, I would see Liverpool Legends again, on the condition that the volume was at a reasonable level. I would also insist on a reduced ticket price based solely on the seating. And a seat in the back.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Photo Gallery June 19, 2012

Time to roll out some random pictures from my "Disposable" folder. I recently read the last post in my previous blog which was sort of laying out a plan for what one could expect from this one. For the most part I think I've remained true to that vision, with just a little tweaking to direct most of it's content towards sons, daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, on and on down the line until the Internet shuts down or Blogger deletes my account due to inactivity. Anyway, what I was going to say is that the description of this blog included a lot more random and/or personal photographs than I've posted. 

I will correct that as of right now. Much more to come, I'm sure. Especially seeing as how we're going to Branson in a couple of weeks and I'll likely come back with tons of pictures to choose from and post.


The Uptown Theater, Kansas City, on the night I saw Sigur Ros for the second time.
I'm hoping that the next time I can post a photo of the venue where I see them
it will be one that is much, much closer to home.
Hands down the best series on television.
It's the only one I watch.
Unfortunately I ditched cable and am missing the 5th season. 
A visit to Hamburger King.
The place practically smells of grease, but the best burgers I've ever eaten.
The phone, btw, is to place your orders with. Pretty cool, no?
"Admiral Fell Promises" by Sun Kil Moon
Got this when it first came out but for some reason didn't listen much.
I'm rectifying that. Great record.
A self-portrait.
Bruce Springsteen "Working on a Dream" tour t-shirt.
Cool "crumpled paper" photo effect makes me look so much better.
Sireeno Kin.
He looks pretty cute with a rawhide bone in his mouth, doesn't he?
He's a good dog. Most of the time.
A remnant from the days when I first got a photo editor.
It was a cheap one and didn't have a whole you could do with it
but it was fun and yielded some oddities such as this..